A vacation bench of the apex court headed by Justice Vikram Nath, while requesting the High Court to take an early decision on the petition challenging the certification given by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), rejected the contention of the filmmakers that The objectionable parts have been removed from the film. Eve teaser.
“We saw the teaser this morning. It continues with all those objectionable dialogues,” said the bench, which also included Justice Sandeep Mehta.
In an order passed on June 7, the Bombay High Court lifted the interim stay on the film's release after a panel constituted by the CBFC on the court's directions sought extension of time to give an unbiased opinion on the film.
Apart from this, High Court judges Kamal Khatta and Rajesh S. Patil's bench said that the filmmakers have voluntarily agreed to remove some controversial dialogues.
Last week, the Karnataka government had banned the release of the film in the state, saying it could disturb communal harmony.
“We saw the teaser this morning. It continues with all those objectionable dialogues,” said the bench, which also included Justice Sandeep Mehta.
In an order passed on June 7, the Bombay High Court lifted the interim stay on the film's release after a panel constituted by the CBFC on the court's directions sought extension of time to give an unbiased opinion on the film.
Apart from this, High Court judges Kamal Khatta and Rajesh S. Patil's bench said that the filmmakers have voluntarily agreed to remove some controversial dialogues.
Last week, the Karnataka government had banned the release of the film in the state, saying it could disturb communal harmony.